Tim Cowlishaw’s prediction: Why Cowboys will beat the Packers | Dallas Morning News

1024 576 Robert Moody

Tim Cowlishaw’s prediction: Why Cowboys will beat the Packers | Dallas Morning News.

GREEN BAY, Wis — No one gets revenge 47 years later. So there’s more to this than simply avenging an Ice Bowl defeat the week that Jethro Pugh, victimized by Lombardi’s Packers on that fateful day, passes away.

Then again it’s not all about the numbers, either, because the numbers say that the Cowboys don’t lose on the road and Green Bay does not lose at home this season. Something has to change.

Give me the team that has demonstrated its road superiority. We have NFL teams that go 8-0 at home basically every season. Crowd noise and the occasional favorable officiating call (do the Cowboys know anything about that?) tend to help the home squad on a weekly basis.

But teams that achieve perfection on the road are rare, and that’s one of the reasons I’ve got Ice Bowl II (preferably with no ice involved) finishing this way:

Cowboys 27, Packers 20.

I’d prefer to make it 21-17 to repeat the score with a different winner from the famous 1967 NFL Championship when the teams fought on the truly “frozen tundra” of Lambeau Field. But the kickoff temperature figures to be about 30 degrees warmer Sunday for this contest, and the defenses seem likely to serve up just a few more points than was the case two generations ago.

Let’s start with the road strength. Only six teams have gone 8-0 on the road since the 1970 merger. It takes a special quality to perform that consistently under adverse conditions, and head coach Jason Garrett’s “home, road, moon, parking lot” mantra has sunk in with this 2014 squad.

“It’s how I grew up, to be honest with you,” Garrett said this week. “It’s [an attitude of] no excuses. Don’t tell me who you’re playing, don’t tell me where you’re playing, it’s your responsibility to be your best. The great players and coaches that I’ve been around have had that attitude.”

Certainly the Cowboys took advantage of some weak road opponents, but they won in Seattle, too, where otherwise the Seahawks are 22-1 in the last three regular seasons.

Dallas’ defense has played better on the road than at home, and that’s going to have to continue to be true Sunday. The Cowboys don’t get many sacks, but they have pressured quarterbacks effectively, and with Aaron Rodgers dealing with that much-discussed calf injury, forcing him to move around is paramount.

I think the more important stat that favors the Dallas defense is the run defense. Even though a relatively pleasant afternoon is anticipated at Lambeau Field, we are still talking about 18 degrees. The team that runs the ball more reliably has to have a greater chance of victory.

And the Cowboys have more than NFL leading rusher DeMarco Murray on their side. The Cowboys ranked eighth in the league against the run this season. The Packers ranked 23rd.

Statistically, Murray wasn’t as great down the stretch as he was early in the season. But finishing with 100 yards against Washington, then picking up another 75 against Detroit has to signal he’s back. On a cold day, someone with the explosive speed of Joseph Randle has the chance to be a difference-maker as well whenever his limited opportunities arise.

Beyond that, much of the pressure falls on Tony Romo. And for Dallas in 2014, that’s never a bad thing, certainly not away from home where he delivered 20 touchdown passes and just two interceptions in that 8-0 regular-season run.

Romo knows what’s at stake, and having grown up in Wisconsin, he’s more than aware of the Lambeau Field mystique. But Romo won there in 2008, and ever since Michael Vick broke through in leading the Falcons to an upset playoff win there in the 2002 postseason, the Packers are 3-5 in home playoff games.

There’s nothing magical about that.

The Cowboys and Garrett grew weary last week hearing about how fortunate they were to have officials’ calls go their way in a 24-20 victory over Detroit. But sometimes the Cowboys did need luck on their side to get the job done at home this season.

On the road, this team has been good more often than lucky. A little pressure on Rodgers and a lot more of what we have seen all year from Murray and Romo on opponents’ soil should produce a major win, even on ground as hallowed as Lambeau Field.


Robert Moody

All stories by: Robert Moody
1 comment
  • charmdatereviewseab

    appear date or hookup

    goodness me, internet dating. If you’ve dated not that long ago 20 years, You’ve likely encountered one or all of the myriad paid dating sites in some form.

    And as we’ve more and more moved our lives online, Digital dating’s as a shed the stigma it once carried, Leaving people free to meet others they choose. these days there are the best dating sites for geeks, and with gamers, And every dating sites for introverts. She knows: she’s been helping clients find love online since 1994.

    “People didn’t have cell phones and laptops, And the task was people would go home, Log on quickly, See who wrote to them and write back, states. “The courtship steps was a lot slower, So it took quite a while to get from the first interaction to you go on a date. Plus rich, There was a stigma concerning online dating. You did not tell people you met your husband or wife, Or boyfriend or girlfriend, as well as a date online,

    As we’ve swapped, So has the online dating site landscape. In the time since their initial launches, The forefathers of dating sites have forged ahead on mobile while keeping their desktop roots.

    Here are our top picks for the these dating sites most worth your time:

    Zoosk is those of you that want something serious, But are open to anyone you can buy.

    What initially began as a facebook app developed in 2007 has grown into a company with 35 million users in more than 80 countries. and not just asking its users for dating questions, Zoosk picks dates for its users with different user’s on site activity. If you shoot a phone message to Jake Doe, as an example, Zoosk says it’ll use that action to determine which types of profiles to show you going forward,Zoosk is fascinating flirty, Spira is marked. “It does provide for a younger crowd more of a millennial crowd,

    Zoosk is free to sign up, But and so forth paid subscription to interact with other users. The company also uses its own form of currency called Zoosk coins that are available to buy. Daters can start using these for features like adding a “enhancement” to their own profiles in search or sending another user a “kind of electronic gift, Users can look at the site on both desktop and mobile.

    Match is great for literally everyone.

    Before there were apps on which one could swipe all over the place on a dizzying number of potential connections, there were Match. indeed, Match is the mother of all these dating sites. published back in 1995, Its decades in the commercial help it bring a ton of insight to the table for singles looking for all kinds of connections. And with its more recent push into mobile come a few new features that have helped make the ancient site more relevant, such as its very own version of Stories, made popular by Snapchat and, uh. Adopted by everybody else. Match users can shoot little videos of their day or add voiceovers to photos and post them to their profiles for other users to follow. “Match is the family brand, Spira informs me. “It’s the one where someone could see their grandmother on, And someone could see their grandson on. It has the main critical mass, And they have done a fabulous job of keeping up with the technology,

    It’s technically free to build a profile and browse for matches, But users who want to engage in direct messaging with their matches has to upgrade to a paid membership, Which costs usually about $20 per month. ladies free trial option.

    Match users can browse on desktop and on mobile through the use of its app. The site also recently added Missed links which, for instance the app Happn, Tells users who they’ve crossed paths with this morning. throughout 25,000 new users join day time, seemingly, And Spira proclaims it “Spans a lot of different romantic types, From casual to significant.

    AdultFriendFinder is our pick for hookup site, And that’s because it’s literally impossible to walk away unfulfilled. It’s like a Pornhub that criminal record search interact with. regardless if you’re looking for an in person hookup or to blow off some steam via sexting or raunchy videos, AFF has exactly what your dirty mind can think of and more. next to nothing is blurred out (never any, definitely, There are lots of unsolicited dick pics), V=but on hand mind that the entire thing looks like a sketchy “There are latina women dating hot singles within driving distance” marketing campaign, you’ll end up in heaven. (Read our full review of AdultFriendFinder here.)

    amazon 25 million monthly users (That’s above and beyond eharmony) and additionally live video options, chat rooms, Groups for ultra specialized kinks, and much more, You often will assume how wild this site can get. but there’s such a large and diverse group of potential matches, You’re very likely to hire a roofer who’s on the same page as you. The part that you wouldn’t expect would be the fact they do offer tons of compatibility questions and matchmaking services, Because they’re that set on finding you a good lay.

    Another bonus is that AdultFriendFinder is like the dating site version of nyc (AKA it never beds down). you could find people who work the regular 9 5, that work the night shift, And people in other timezones, So it’s nearly impossible to log on and not have people to talk to. AdultFriendFinder is like the booty call that’s always awake immediately after you text them.

    you can read our full review on AdultFriendFinder here and sign up here.

    The dating site eharmony is best suited for straight people who actually want to get married.

    based in 2000 by Dr. Neil Clark Warren, Eharmony is the website for serious daters. relationships. (Read our full athleanx workout review eharmony here.)

    Users answer a lengthy questionnaire that helps eharmony know what it calls a “A select group of compatible matches with whom you can build a quality loving relationship, Spira says she actually seen eharmony as a “Matrimonial seeing each other site,

    SEE on top of that: Read our full post on eharmony

    “i am not saying you’re going to walk down the aisle, But it certainly means that you’re looking for a very serious relationship that may or may not lead to marriage. It may lead to living together or at least being in an upmarket, Committed spouse,

    Profiles also look really nice, Like a fancy rsum designed by a graphic artist. You even have the choice to put your favorite TV shows, music, pastimes, and many more on your profile, And I really appreciated that they allow your personality to be the main objective.

    While it’s free to make your free account, respond to questions, And see your matches, you must select a paid membership to make contact. price points start at $22.95 per month and eharmony prevails on both desktop and through its app.

    It’s not suited to users looking to date casually or for daters looking for same sex relationships. Offering men seeking men or women seeking women options should be a no brainer but eharmony’s founders are pretty conservative. Neil Warren, the main octogenarian cofounder and CEO, Insists that your entire ordeal wasn’t an anti gay thing at all. “We didn’t want to pretend to be experts on gay and lesbian couples, Said Warren in a 2016 CNN manual.

    The site is literally called iHookup and it’s used for exactly what it sounds like need we say anything else? It’s slightly less risqu than its main adversary AdultFriendFinder, But still clearly used for a similar thing.

Comments are closed.